Public Page
2020-09-29 Architecture Meeting Minutes
- Paulette Reed
Public Page
CIECA 500 Westover Dr #11617; Sanford, NC 27330
Date
Sep 29, 2020
ANTITRUST STATEMENT
As participants in this meeting, we need to be mindful of the constraints of antitrust laws. There shall be no discussions of agreements or concerted actions that may restrain competition. This prohibition includes the exchange of information concerning individual prices, rates, coverages, market practices, claims settlement practices, or any other competitive aspect of an individual company’s operation. Each participant is obligated to speak up immediately for the purpose of preventing any discussion falling outside these bounds.
Agenda
Antitrust and Meeting minutes acceptance
Review VDI Code List Addition request for 2020R2
Feedback on Architecture Guideline changes
Agenda for QA
Percentage is defined differently in the BMS (some negative and some positive only) do we need to standardize?
Go through the new items that need to be spelled checked to get approval of spellings and added to the list.
Review of the JSON Draft Provided from Stacey (When Ready). Can we move this off agenda?
Meeting Minutes
Antitrust was agreed upon.
Meeting minutes were accepted from last meeting.
The new VDI Code list Addition was approved.
CIECA project Coordinator created the Test Instance document to test change because requestor was not sure how to do this.
Architecture Guidelines were approved
Discussion on XML spy using the shell for revisions, but only the build version will have code list for validations.
QA planning
Quick discussion about QA.
Don and Becky is taking it offline to find the best time for the meeting.
Up Next
Antitrust and Meeting minutes acceptance
Architecture Guidelines for creating Test Instances
If requestor does not know how to create these, what should be our standard process.
The 2020 Tactical Plan had a step for every committee to verify the test instances which was planned to be executed by Charley, do we need to change this process?
Create Agenda for QA
Review BMS
Review Schema
Review Test Instance
Percentage is defined differently in the BMS (some negative and some positive only) do we need to standardize?
Go through the new items that need to be spelled checked to get approval of spellings and added to the list.
JSON (should this be removed from Agenda?)
Review of the JSON Draft Provided from Stacey (When Ready).
Tactical plan has 2 JIRAS for JSON work.
Action Items
Decisions
Participants
@Paulette Reed- Facilitator/Scribe
Dan Webster
Becky Kimmick
Chris Poulos
Jeff Schroeder
Mike Hastings
Phil Martinez
Andy Bober
@Paul Barry