2021-03-31 Meeting notes

Owned by Paulette Reed
Last updated: Apr 01, 2021
4 min read

 

Public Page

 

 

 

 

      
   CIECA 500 Westover Dr  #11617; Sanford,  NC  27330 

Date

Mar 31, 2021

ANTITRUST STATEMENT

As participants in this meeting, we need to be mindful of the constraints of antitrust laws. There shall be no discussions of agreements or concerted actions that may restrain competition. This prohibition includes the exchange of information concerning individual prices, rates, coverages, market practices, claims settlement practices, or any other competitive aspect of an individual company’s operation. Each participant is obligated to speak up immediately for the purpose of preventing any discussion falling outside these bounds.

Agenda

  • Antitrust Agreement and Meeting minutes acceptance

  • The SAB Committee Accepted the Business Charter and Business Plan

  • Review Question Log and set with the Emerging Technologies.

  • Work through the Emerging Technologies next Steps.

Meeting Minutes

  • Antitrust Accepted

  • Meeting Minutes Accepted

  • The SAB Committee accepted the Business Charter and Business Plan for this committee

  • Reviewed the Question Log

    • Most of the questions are to do with supply chain and that is not one of the top 5 we are looking at; would we like to move supply chain?

      • There was the possibility to combine ADAS with AI; it was decided that AI touched all of the Emerging Technologies and that was why it was number one and will remain on its own.

    • At this time Supply Chain will stay out of the top 5

  • Reviewed the Emerging Technologies page that has the information captured in the last meeting and information sent via email and later correspondence.

  • ADAS and Electrification are the Emerging Technologies that are in place today and need to be looked at first.

    • ADAS we have multiple OEM repair procedures to access to get data. Each OEM has a layout, codes, procedures that are best for their vehicles, but the data is not represented the same and for some repairers this information is hard to find.

      • Approximately 20+ ADAS systems

      • Approximately 15 OEM Platforms

    • The SA/SAE and NASTF committees are working on standardization of the Repair Procedures

      • Terminology

      • It was recommended that the work these committees are doing outside of CIECA would be good places for CIECA to work with and get parity across the industry.

    • Repair procedures are available for everyone from all of the OE platforms

      • Build search engines to pull the repair procedures

    • CIECA looks at the workflows to capture data that is needed and new messages; is there any problem areas with ADAS that we need to look at existing workflows; new workflows that are not defined to get the data?

      • Camera calibration for each OEM, what data will need to be captured to repair, what tools can be identified in the data, the procedures to fix themselves are data.

        • Do we need to look at each individual component of ADAS and created specific messages?

      • We need compatible data to share to make the process of repairs simpler.

        • We do not one to take one OE repair guide and decide the data, this is why the industry as a whole is invited to these meetings, we need to know what the problem points are and work as an industry to find the best data solution. We will need to look at many examples to determine the best solution.

          • Who are the Actors

          • What triggers a message request

          • How will we break down the Repair Procedure information or do we send it as one note section?

          • Do we standardize diagnostic codes

          • What is common data elements and uncommon elements

          • What parameters are needed to recover the correct repair procedure

            • Model

            • Area of repair

      • We do need to be able to document the Repair Procedure by a document number, that can be used to show that the work was required by the Repair Procedure, log the procedure as completed on this date and validated.

        • Repair Procedure ID

        • Procedures Identified

        • Date of completion of procedures

        • Tech that executed the procedures

      • At this time 5% of the Procedures done by a repairer based on the Repair Procedures is being covered by the Insurance companies.

        • Most OE provide the Insurance Carriers with the Repair Procedures for Free.

        • Repairers need this information documented so they can get paid.

    • Repair procedures has always been an issue and we agree that it is not CIECAs goal to standardize these processes with the OEM. But CIECA may be able to stretch the role that we currently have to find the data; to help the industry come up with the common needs and workflows; which will drive out the data.

    • For next meeting we will work on the Actors for ADAS

      • OEM

      • Repairer

      • Vehicle

      • Consumer

Great Meeting; Have a Great Week!

Up Next

  • Antitrust Agreement and Meeting minutes acceptance

  • ADAS Actors

Action items

Decisions

 

Participants

  • Paulette Reed (Scribe)

  • Charles Dillard

  • Chuck Olsen

  • Andrew Nicolay

  • Ian Morton

  • Frank Terlep (Co-Chair)

  • Heather Bartolotta

  • Stacy Phillips

  • Benito Cid

  • Troy Stone

  • Don Porter

  • Michelle Corson

  • Paul Barry

  • Mark Allen

  • Chuck Searles

  • Dave Solak

  • Pete Tag

  • Chris Fatica

Participants in the meetings are noted for your information.  If you have questions on the committee’s activities, please contact a recent attendee. https://cieca.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ETAC

Â