2021-05-19 Meeting notes

Public Page

   CIECA 500 Westover Dr  #11617; Sanford,  NC  27330 

Date

May 19, 2021

Agenda

• Antitrust and Meeting Minutes acceptance

• Review proposed committee changes from last meeting and discuss if we need to change the Mission Statement of the committee or changes our Business Plan?

• Vehicle is the Center of the Workflow; should we create a Vehicle Life Cycle document to identify where the EV is different from the combustion engine vehicle and possibly identify areas to research?

• Existing Pain Points for the Industry with Emerging Technology.  Should we prioritize these issues and focus on these areas instead of starting at the beginning of the Vehicle physical damage cycle?

  • OEM Repair Procedures access,  Inspection process (What Type of inspection is needed for deployment), and Calibration/System Learning are all existing pain points.

• New Definitions for CIC

Meeting Minutes

• Antitrust Agreed Accepted

• Meeting Minutes Accepted

• Recap of last meeting

• Mission Statement and Problem statement of the Emerging Technologies was reviewed

  • The current charter is good with the wording that allows for flexibility.

  • We need to make sure that we stay within the bounds of the Emerging Technologies Charter, but working on pain points is something that falls within the existing Charter.

  • The general purpose of the meeting is to help identify emerging technologies and the impact to the industry, however, when it is new, there may be vague areas and we do not want to guess. This committee roll will be to identify the upcoming technologies and reach out to the correct committees, organizations to help identify data standards needs and messages.

  • CIECA looks to create the data standards messages, how organizations use or implement those standards are not up to CIECA or its committee’s.

• When this committee reviews priority of emerging technologies or pain points, we need to make sure the Infrastructure is there to handle the standards.

  • Today the infrastructure is in place for OEM Repair Procedures.

    • We have 20+ OEM Repair Procedures

    • We have after market Repair Procedures in place as well.

• This committee will identify industry actors that need to be involved to make sure we provide standards that are effective across all lines of business.

  • In the last meeting, it was mentioned that we needed participation from ETI and SI. Frank and Gene reached out to individuals to get their participation in emerging technologies.

• Survey Emerging Technologies Actors that were identified to see what Pain Points they are experiencing.

  • At this time, we feel that the members of this committee can provide the feedback needed, we have members for most of the lines of business, or have recently requested members to join.

  • CIECA is doing a survey of committee members and it will be possible to ask a general question on emerging technologies to see what we get in that survey.

• Where to Start?

  • Reviewed the Question Log/Pain Points and Calibration and OEM Repair Procedures were the highest priority pain points.

  • EV battery and the impact to the industry was mentioned, however, it is in the market today does not seem to be a huge pain point. It is evolving with new regulations and actors, and it is good to bring this information to the committee to educate the committee members.

  • We discussed what inspection was from the last meeting, and if we scan a vehicle before repair and scan a vehicle after repair, just because all the codes or cleared, does that mean it is fixed? Where do we need to store items that were impacted that was not part of the inspection process and needed to be repaired?

    • In discussing Inspection, the question was ask, where does Inspection start, does it start before the Crash, at the time of impact?

    • This had us review the FNOL workflow and discuss how and what we would like to decide as this committee and when we would reach out to FNOL committee.

      • It was decided that this committee would identify if a need existed for FNOL and then we would transfer the education of this committee to FNOL (or other CIECA committee) to do the work.

      • The working committee’s would bring back discussion to this committee to keep everyone in sync.

Great Meeting Everyone! Homework for Paulette is to work on the FNOL documentation and workflows for the next meeting. Homework for Frank is to look at the OEM Repair Procedure process to identify actors and workflow.

Up Next

• Antitrust Agreement and Meeting minutes acceptance

• Recording meetings

• Review FNOL and OEM Repair Procedure

Action items

Decisions

1. Existing Charter covers all areas this committee feels we will be working on.
2. This committee will review CIECA’s existing workflows to determine if emerging technologies or new actors are involved. Bring this information to CIECAS existing committees or create a sub committee to work on these areas.
3. This committee will work on determining data standards needed to improve the OEM Repair procedure data retrieval workflow.

Participants

• Paulette Reed (Scribe)

• Steve Betley

• Heather Bartolotta

• Chuck Searles

• James Spears

• Charles Dillard

• Ginny Whelan

• Kevin Kingsley

• Phil Martinez

• Russ Sims

• Don Porter

• Pal Barry

• Stephen Applebaum

• Frank Terlep

• Chris Caris

• Fred Iantorno

Participants in the meetings are noted for your information.  If you have questions on the committee’s activities, please contact a recent attendee. https://cieca.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ETAC